16.11.09

The Science of Mothers day; NOT really a Monkey; Maternal Deprivation Harry Harlow and the ‘WhyFiles’

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Mothers Global Justice Alliance.

Permalink

Drastic deprivation

“The legal system is being used to inflict Maternal Deprivation on children and their mothers. Networks of unethical lawyers, Guardian Ad Litems, Psychologists, and other purveyors of  “Parental Alienation Syndrome” junk science will advocate for abusers and vilify protective parents FOR PROFIT. Evidence of abuse does not matter and is ignored when these unethical Parental Alienation accusing professionals show up in cases and use rhetoric to accuse the mother of being an “Alienator” then give visitation and/or custody to the abuser often removing the mother from the child’s life all together. Any mother who has been victimized by this fraudulent scheme needs to get the message out to the world and expose these people.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmbbfisRiwA&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&feature=player_embedded&fs=1]

For details of this Maternal Deprivation as a form of Abuse click here: Maternal Deprivation Research

Maternal Deprivation was inflicted on monkeys by Harry Harlow with terrible consequences. Now this abuse is spreading to humans promulgated by unethical psychologists who are experimenting in social engineering on human children.

Posted in Uncategorized. Tags: abuse, anti-psychology, child abuse, custody, divorce, domestic abuse, domestic violence,evaluator, failure to protect, false allegations, Family Court, father's rights, fictitious syndromes, fraud, parental alienation,psychologist, Richard Gardner, scam, scandal, unethical, visitation, visitation refusal.”

 

 

The Science of Mother's Day

 http://whyfiles.org/087mother/4.html

Drastic deprivation

The late Harry Harlow, a professor of psychology at the University of Wisconsin, with an infant monkey and wire surrogate mother.

Photo courtesy of the UW-Madison Archives.

 

Not really a monkey...
When she studied the effects of severe maternal deprivation under pioneering psychologist Harry Harlow, neuroscientist Mary Carlson probably never expected to see similar deprivation in human children -- especially thousands of them.

an infant monkey and wire model surrogate mother
Harlow's name is bonded to experiments that might be questionable today. For example, he separated a baby monkey from its mother and raised it in a cage with two substitute "mothers." The wire "mother" had a bottle for the infant, the cloth one didn't. Tellingly, as soon as the infants finished nursing, they abandoned the wire monkey and clutched the cloth one.

Even though the experiment demonstrated the primacy of nurture to sustenance, the cloth mother was not an adequate replacement: the isolated monkeys grew up with severe emotional and behavioral problems, says Carlson, associate professor of neuroscience and psychology at Harvard Medical School.

Even when raised in cages where they could see, smell and hear -- but not touch -- other monkeys, the infants developed what she called an "autistic-like" syndrome, with grooming, self-clasping, social withdrawal and rocking.

The theme of Harlow's work, she says, is that "You were not really a monkey unless you were raised in an interactive monkey environment."

Carlson says Harlow's demonstration of the power of social deprivation "directed my career." After a long period mapping nerve connections between the hand and the brain, she now studies the impact of abuse and isolation on the HPA (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal) axis, and on the powerful stress hormone, cortisol, made by the HPA.

 mom

We've already described how touch modifies this important stress system in rats. Children show similar effects: a child vaccinated while sitting on a mother's lap has a relatively low rise in cortisol. (By the way, cortisol is usually measured in saliva. Drooling -- actually swabs of the mouth -- provides plenty of samples, so there's no need to jab kids for blood samples.)

In the orphanage
If Harlow's monkey experiments might be considered cruel today, what can we say about the human deprivation "experiment" in Romanian orphanages? Carlson says she found the whole affair "pretty shocking. We thought the whole world knew that institutional care was insufficient to maintain the social capacity of the human baby."

But not in Romania, where the long-time communist dictator, Nicolae Ceausescu, was a zealous believer in technological progress. Highly skeptical of all things touchy-feelie, he clamped down on psychology and social work in preference to engineering and science. He favored policies to raise the birth rate and established institutions for orphans and children whose parents could not care for them.

After Ceausescu was executed in the coup in 1989, the orphanages were opened to a world that saw Dickensian warehouses for the unwanted. Scientific study confirmed what the untrained eye could see: The children were in the third to tenth percentile for physical growth, and "grossly delayed" in motor and mental development, Carlson says. They rocked and grasped themselves like Harlow's monkeys, and grew up with weird social values and behavior.

As they aged, many of the orphans became homeless, with what Carlson calls "clumsy, sad, all inappropriate" social interactions. To express affection, one boy might kiss another -- on the top of the head. Smiling and ingratiating, the youths are superficially friendly but unable to form permanent attachments. Like characters in a gloomy sci-fi novel, many found work in the secret police, where their lack of loyalty and ability to make "friends" were saleable traits.

Chemical analysis showed abnormal cortisol profiles, indicating a severe problem with the stress response. Carlson compared children living under improved conditions to the rest of the orphans -- and found their cortisol looking more normal. Another indication that the stress response can respond to conditions came from a study by Carlson of Romanian children in poor-quality day care. During the week, cortisol was abnormal, but when they returned home for the weekend, it looked more normal.

To Carlson, the issue is not simply science, but human rights. Romania, like every other country except the United States and Somalia, has ratified the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, obligating it to provide foster or adoptive parents to orphans, rather than cold institutions.

The goal of her research, she says, is not simply to prove that neglect causes hormonal changes, but also to prevent future abuse. "We felt Romania was in violation of the rights of the child, and we thought maybe a molecule [cortisol] would make a strong argument -- to people who did not find the behavior" compelling enough.

Indeed, things have begun looking up in Romania: the new president has established a Children's Office and declared the intention to close the orphanages. Workers in the orphanage she studied have started cuddling the children and trying to teach colleagues about children's emotional needs.

Closer to home
As the day-care results indicate, strong stress reactions can occur after mistreatment that's less severe than total deprivation. Says Michael Meaney of McGill University, who studies stress reactions in rats, "You don't need to go into abuse, extreme neglect to see these effects. Even in the normal range of behavior, [abuse] can result in extraordinary differences in the HPA stress response."

Changes in the stress response early in life could explain how identical twins can wind up with different personalities, Meaney says. "The development of individual differences is determined largely by an individual's environment early in life." Yet he stresses that the stress response is not always bad. "It's a beautifully integrated response that helps meet the demands of stressful situations."

It's just that preparing for stress becomes counter-productive if life proves less stressful than the animal "anticipated."

To Carlson, the Romanian research has another implication. The consistent relationship between poor care and abnormal cortisol raises the question of what's happening to American children in poor day care.

To many working parents, the idea of finding -- and using -- day care is stress enough.

 
The Why Files 

There are 1 2 3 4 5 6 pages in this feature.
Bibliography | Credits | Feedback | Search

©1999, University of Wisconsin, Board of Regents.

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Mothers Global Justice Alliance.

Permalink

Letter to Government Officials re: Lorraine Tipton

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] I will not SHUT UP , GIVE UP and I WONT go away!!.

Permalink

 

http://lorrainetiptongovoff.blogspot.com/

3030 Williamsburg Drive Schenectady New York 12303

Children’s Rights

“Giving a voice to those who cannot speak for themselves”

Governor James Doyle

Dear Governor Doyle:

I am writing to you because I need your help with a very urgent matter concerning the welfare of a young child in your state. Her name is Michaela, and she is 11 years old. I am writing on behalf of Michaela and of her mom who has fought tirelessly to protect her child from the horrific abuse of an angry ex-boyfriend. On Thursday, October 12, Michaela’s mom is facing a jail sentence and Michaela is threatened with placement in foster care. I believe it is only fair that you are made aware of the atrocity of injustice Michaela and her mom have had to suffer at the hands of the family court system of Wisconsin.

While in the care of her father, Michaela has been the victim of sexual, as well as emotional and psychological abuse and neglect. In addition to the attached documented (and substantiated) sexual abuse, Michaela has been forcibly fed her own vomit. She is left to sleep either on the living room floor or in the unfinished basement while her father and grandmother occupy the only two bedrooms. She lives in constant fear due to the unpredictable behaviors of her inebriated father and grandmother, and is regularly put in danger as a passenger in the car of her father who continually drives under the influence of alcohol.

Michaela’s mother and step-father have exhausted their resources yet continue to fight for Michaela’s safety. Though reports of abuse were substantiated by CPS, and reports by Michaela of other kinds of abuse were deemed true by concerned mental health professionals who consider Michaela to be in imminent danger, the court has decided to ignore the evidence, and thus, continues to place Michaela in harm’s way. What are most disturbing are the questionable practices of the court (see attached documentation) as this little girl’s welfare is continually placed in jeopardy. In fact, despite the facts, as time goes on Michaela’s dad has been awarded more access to Michaela while her mom has had to withstand criticism, chastisement, and punishment from the court.

After years of being subjected to such dangerous and frightening conditions, Michaela has decided to stand up for herself and adamantly refuses to visit her father. Withstanding 3 years of living with knowledge of the abuse and now after hearing the desperate pleas of her frightened and endangered daughter, Michaela’s mom now finds it impossible to force Michaela to visit her father against her will. In the past Michaela has been refused the opportunity to speak with local authorities as well as the District Attorney. Presently, she has been denied her own request to be heard by the court.

After years of this unjust treatment on the part of the Wisconsin family court system, the judge has now ordered that on Thursday October 12 at 10:00am, if Michaela’s mom has not been successful in forcing Michaela to visit her dad, she will then be sentenced to 30 days in jail, and Michaela will be permanently placed in foster care. Today, Sunday October 8, Michaela and her family are having Thanksgiving dinner, in the unfortunate event that they are all separated this Thursday.

I am confident that after hearing of this egregious situation and after reading the following documentation (supported by the necessary evidence) you will agree that immediate action needs to be taken to protect this little girl. I believe in our government. I believe in the just treatment it promises. That is why it is so disconcerting and incomprehensible to witness what appears to be “court-sanctioned” abuse.

I thank you for taking the time to review the enclosed documentation and would greatly appreciate your immediate intervention in this matter before further injustice is cast upon Michaela and her mother. Feel free to contact Michaela’s mom, Lorraine Tipton at (920) 785-0328, or I can be reached at (518) 505-9200. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth B. McVey

Founder/Child Advocate

Supporting evidence and documentation:

Official court Transcripts

Private Investigator Photos and Reports

Audio Tape of Court Hearing

Counseling Notes and Records

CPS Report Substantiating Sexual Abuse

    Mother – Lorraine Tipton

    Father – Craig Hensberger

    Judges – Hon. Frank Calvert

Hon. David Miron

    CPS Worker – Carrie Burke

    Forensic Interviewer – Sara Schumacher

    Guardian ad Litem - _____ Krzewinski

cc:

Senator David Hause

Assemblyman John Nygren

The Wisconsin State Attorney General

The Committee on Judicial Affairs

The Office of Children and Family Services

The Wisconsin State Bar Association

Wisconsin State National Organization for Women

The Wisconsin Coalition Against Domestic Violence

“Working Together To Bring The Truth Into The Light”

Posted by Elizabeth McVey at 11:20 AM 0 comments

Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] I will not SHUT UP , GIVE UP and I WONT go away!!.

Permalink

LORRAINE TIPTON CASE Father refuses to see daughter so that mother will remain in jail!

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] A Human Rights Issue-Custodial Justice.

Permalink

http://refusesvisitpressrelease.blogspot.com/

 

Father Refuses visitation . . .

LORRAINE TIPTON CASE

Father refuses to see daughter so that mother will remain in jail!

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Elizabeth McVey

Children’s Rights

Albany, New York

November 14, 2009

518-505-9200

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Lorraine Tipton was jailed on Thursday for not being able to force her daughter to visit her alcoholic and abusive father, Craig Hensberger. Tipton’s daughter cracked under the pressure and decided it was too much to know her mother was sitting in jail because of her. Over the weekend 11year old Michaela called her father numerous times to let him know that she would visit him and asked if him to pick her up. Hensberger repeatedly told his daughter that he was not going to pick her up and that “her mother needed to sit in jail for at least 20 days because that was what he had to do.” In June 2005 Hensberger was convicted was convicted of a second DUI in less than a year. At the time his daughter was a passenger in the car. Hensberger spent 20 days in jail as a result.

Not only did Hensberger tell his daughter that Tipton needed to sit in jail, but he made a joke, asking Michaela if “she wanted to give her mother a banana, because she was a monkey behind bars.” It seems that keeping his daughter’s mother in jail and his daughter miserable has become “sport” to Hensberger. This might make some wonder just how much danger Michaela would be putting herself in to save her mother. If Hensberger is so bent on seeing Tipton suffer, what happens if she is let out of jail because his daughter agrees to visitation? What lengths would Hensberger go to make sure Tipton continues to suffer? One sure line of recourse would be to further abuse Michaela.

No matter how horrific the abuse Hensberger should subject his daughter to, how likely would it be for Judge Miron to listen to further allegations from the girl’s mother? Or perhaps Hensberger might try to withhold his daughter from her mother. After all, wouldn’t Judge Miron forgive Mr. Hensberger for keeping his daughter as, according to him, Tipton willingly refused to send Michaela for visitation with her father? Isn’t it interesting how many avenues there are to torture the mother of your child when you have the judicial system behind you?

After deciding she simply couldn’t live with the fact that her mother was still in jail, today Michaela arranged it with her step-father, Chad Tipton, to be dropped off to Mr. Hensberger. At approximately 7:00 pm Michaela was brought by her step-father and another relative to Hensberger’s mother’s house. Upon seeing his daughter, Hensberger became enraged and adamantly refused to let his daughter in the house. He told Mr. Tipton that he did not want her, and that he wanted to see to it that her mother remained in jail. Michaela’s grandmother repeatedly instructed Michaela to pick up her things and put them back in her step-father’s car.

After continued and numerous refusals by Hensberger, Mr. Tipton called the Sheriff’s department for assistance. Upon arriving on the scene, the deputys found Hensberger to be argumentative and disagreeable. Hensberger continued to say that he did not want his daughter to visit, and that he wanted to see that Tipton sat in jail. Deputy Lt. Mason told Hensberger “he wasn’t to use his daughter as a pawn to punish her mother.” He said “You are the father. You need to make sure she has a place to sleep tonight and that she gets to school tomorrow.”When Hensberger continued to insist that he did not want Michaela there the Deputy asked, “Mr. Hensberger, are you refusing to take your daughter?” He went on to say, “If you don’t take her we will have no choice, but to put her in foster care.” It was then that Hensberger agreed to take Michaela.

Wouldn’t it seem that a father who fought so tirelessly in court to ensure visitation with his daughter would welcome her with open arms? It would appear that Mr. Hensberger has been more concerned all along with making Michaela’s mother suffer than with Michaela herself. Isn’t it interesting that Judge Miron seemed sufficiently convinced that this poor father was so distraught over not seeing his daughter that he went to such severe lengths to make this reunion possible? What would Judge Miron think if he heard that Hensberger refused to take his daughter to the tune of 13 times? Would he apologize for the harsh sentence he cast based on what appears to be a clear error in judgement?

And how does a judge apologize in a situation like this? You would think he’d begin by making sure that Ms. Tipton was released from jail first thing tomorrow morning. Next, you would hope that he would be able to admit that he was wrong, and given the fact that he was wrong, one would hope that he might rethink the probable danger in which he has just placed this young child.

It will be interesting to see what Judge Miron does tomorrow morning and how fast he acts upon learning of this evening’s events. It is highly doubtful that Judge Miron will ever admit to anything less than perfect judgment on his part. In fact if Michaela is abused so severely that she feels, once again, she will not be able to visit her father, would it be far-fetched to believe that Tipton will be back in jail possibly before she is even let out?

 

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] A Human Rights Issue-Custodial Justice.

Permalink

PETITION FOR LORRAINE TIPTON AND MICHAELA

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Mothers Justice- Initiative Project.

Permalink

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/217/petition-for-lorraine-tipton-and-michaela

 

PETITION FOR LORRAINE TIPTON AND MICHAELA

Target:

5,000

Sponsored by:

SUPPORT FOR LORRAINE TIPTON

PETITION FOR LORRAINE TIPTON AND MICHAELA

                Lorraine Tipton is a concerned and caring mother who has tried for the past three years to obey a court order even though it meant forcing her daughter to go and stay with her sexually, and otherwise, abusive father.  Michaela (now 11 yrs old) says that she is absolutely terrified of going to her father%u2019s, that she is not safe with him, and now insists that she simply can and will not go. Lorraine has spoken with her daughter, but can no longer find it within herself to force her daughter to willingly accept further abuse. 

Today, Judge Miron of Marrinette County, Wi, sentenced Lorraine to 30 days in jail.  She was taken immediately and will not be let out unless Michaela goes with her father, and Lorraine%u2019s jail sentence will continued to be renewed until Michaela agrees.  This is not a position an 11 year old should be put in, nor is jail a place for her mother.  Michaela has asked for a chance to speak with the judge and have her own voice heard.  The judge has denied her this right.  Respected and concerned mental health professionals have met with Michaela and believe she is telling the truth.  Child Protective Services interviewed Michaela and substantiated a report against her father for sexual abuse.  Why won%u2019t Judge Miron give Michaela the same courtesy and listen to her desperate pleas for help?!

                Despite attempts to reach out to government officials, this outrageous injustice has been allowed to be cast down upon Lorraine and Michaela.  Lorraine is now on a hunger strike, her family is devastated, and Michaela is torn in pieces.  This is no way to look out for the best interests of a child!  There are men and women all over the country who have been watching as this horrific case of %u201Ccourt-ordered%u201D abuse has unfolded.  We are asking that this case be looked into, that this egregious injustice be dealt with, and that Lorraine, Michaela, and their family be put back together.  We are asking that Michaela is given a chance to be heard once and for all.  This grave misuse of power cannot be stood for!  If Judge Miron is going to continue to put this child in harm%u2019s way and punish her mother for protecting her than he has become part of the problem and should be held responsible for continuing to traumatize this innocent and defenseless child!

Elizabeth McVey

       Children's Rights

       Albany, New York

.      

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Mothers Justice- Initiative Project.

Permalink

THE LORRAINE TIPTON CASE

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Battered Mothers Rights - A Human Rights Issue.

Permalink

 

http://thelorrainetiptoncase.blogspot.com/2009/11/lorraine-tipton-case.html

THE LORRAINE TIPTON CASE

RESS RELEASE Contact: Elizabeth McVey Children’s Rights Albany, New York November 14, 2009 518-505-9200 For Immediate Release

Thursday November 12,

Lorraine Tipton was sentenced to 30 days in jail and taken into immediate custody. Judge David Miron, of Marinette County, Wisconsin Circuit Court, says that Lorraine will continue to serve consecutive sentences as long as her 11 year old daughter refuses to visit her alcoholic and abusive father.

Furthermore, Lorraine’s daughter is not able to visit her mother in jail as long as she remains in the care and protection of her step-father because he is not allowed to take her to the jail, and she cannot go on her own. It looks like the judge thinks that a mother trying to protect her child from sexual abuse, endangerment, torment, and neglect is a danger to both her community and to her own child.

After being charged with a DUI and thought to be endangering the child, the girl’s father was ordered by the court to stay sober during his visitation time with his daughter. Despite the court order, he continues to drive his daughter around while he is under the influence. On Friday November 7, a day when the father was supposed to have visitation with his daughter, he was seen out drinking at one of the local bars. Visitation was not withheld from the father.

On the contrary, the father was apparently too busy drinking to go and pick his daughter up from school. Judges wonder why people violate their court orders. We wonder why judges force parents to send their children back into a situation in which they must know there is immediate risk of harm.

Judge Miron apparently believes that a substantiated CPS report of sexual abuse, along with reports from the child of being force fed her own vomit, and having nowhere to sleep at her father’s house except on the living room floor or in an unfinished basement, does not pose a threat of immediate harm. What are the child’s rights in this case? According to Judge Miron, she has the right to know that her mother has been dragged off to jail and punished for protecting her.

She also enjoys the right to be put at risk with no one watching or caring what happens to her. Judge Miron says that Tipton is “poisoning” her daughter against her father and coaching her daughter in what to report. Yet when the child was brought, by her father, to an interview with The Child Advocacy Center she gave the exact same testimony of abuse and neglect that she had previously given. In fact, she even told the interviewers that her father had instructed her to lie to them.

After the interview, it was strongly suggested to Tipton that she get an order of protection, and she was told that CPS was going to file a CHIPS petition (Child in Need of Protection). So, Judge Miron, which parent is really doing the “poisoning” and coaching of the child? The judge has also told Lorraine Tipton that she should not worry about her child being driven around in the car of a father who is under the influence, because the father was warned not to do it again. Only in family court is a victim of crime placed in the care of the perpetrator who has simply been told by the court not to do it again.

Ms. Tipton is being punished for refusing to force her child to go and stay with her father. Had the identical information been presented about the “neighbor 3 doors down”, or any other stranger, Ms. Tipton would be considered negligent if she allowed the child to go with them again. What mother or father would willingly send a child off to be driven around by a neighbor who had been convicted of a DUI and warned by the judge the stay sober when children were around? What parent rests easy when their child is reporting graphic accounts of sexual abuse? What mother listens to her child talk of forcibly being made to eat her own vomit and simply lets it go?

Apparently, the family courts apply different rules to the negligent and abusive behavior of a neighbor and the same negligent and abusive behavior of the child’s very own parent, with whom he/she must reside for significant periods of time. At very least, what is appropriate and inappropriate, and by which party, is subject to the discretion of a single family court judge, regardless of his bias.

Furthermore, if these reports were made by the child against the mother, Ms. Tipton might well be deemed, by this very same judge, as unfit. If this was criminal court, and these acts were committed by a neighbor, the neighbor would be punished and kept where he or she could not do this to a child again.

Ms. Tipton’s rights and responsibilities to protect her child are being thwarted by the very system designed to protect children. Should decisions as life-altering as these be left up to the sole interpretation of one family court judge? And should Judge Miron’s final decision in this case be considered an “interpretation” of the law or an “abuse” of the law? Should protective parents be punished and jailed if they refuse to put their children at risk?

If the child were to be seriously and/or permanently harmed will this judge be held responsible for aiding and abetting child abuse? The real tragedy is that these children lose their entire childhoods when judges won’t protect them. Is this what the state of Wisconsin wants for its children?

Posted by Elizabeth McVeyat 5:14 PM

Labels: Children's Rights

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Battered Mothers Rights - A Human Rights Issue.

Permalink

Shawnee County Court LIVES of Battered Mothers and their Children Continue to be Destroyed

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] A Human Rights Issue-Custodial Justice.

Permalink

[I went ahead and hyperlinked for our ease and access to a site I DO NOT have access to. (For this VERY reason) albeit I must have provided much of the info as they are my case….. so be it then.

My review to be in compliance (again) of Contempt is the Nov. 20th, 2009  then, ….IF …..I am a GOOD little GIRL… maybe I wont go to jail and maybe, they MIGHT give me SV (again like last ten year cycle) hrg tentatively set Dec. 16th 2009. For SV maybe…]

[17 years in 3 easy documents… my legacy?.]

[hope all are well; never give up never give in, not ever!]

c

FW: Case,  KS Appellate Law, request for documents and 4 attachments. (also hyperlinked below)

From: AngelFury@AngelFury.org [mailto:AngelFury@Ange lFury.org]
Sent: Monday, November 16, 2009 1:09 PM
To: 'TuckDuncan
Subject: Case, KS Appellate Law, request for documents and 4 attachments.
Importance: High

I have already eliminated the alleged images of Jason’s 11th hour motion. I have also disposed of all accounts and given away the blogs I have had access to posting to. Weather another picks them up or not is not up to me.

I also want you to be aware of 2003 Appellate court ruling which DIRECTLY relates to what Judge Debenham JUST ordered by suspending my parenting time ..again… without due process and against the law and against the 2003 Court of Appeals ruling below.

I have also attached four documents (to do with as you wish) that I have preserved in relinquishing any online storage that I have any control of and how incredibly this case cries for justice.

1.) 1997 Brief of Appellant (Dombrowski)

2.) 2000 Illegal Custody switch (Anderson)

3.) Inter-American Commission Human Rights (my part) that leads suit Known as (Dombrowski et el v US 2007)

4.) Kimbrell et Kimbrell Appellate Word.docx http://www.kscourts.org/Cases-and-Opinions/opinions/ctapp/2005/20050916/93450.htm

Please advise, and again thank you. I will attempt to get a more accurate SSADI of MY gross income. My gross does NOT include what dad gets for my child on behalf of MY Dependent minor child.

You had asked once, “what would I do had I not had a child?’ en re SSADI et my dependent care child I have not held un ten + years…

Answer:

I would not be in the situation I am in now Tuck… depleted by court and batterer as the hold my ‘child’ hostage.

“I would still be a nurse with the state of Kansas and I would never had beaten several times half to death and almost death had it not been for the fact that I was blessed with what I learn to be the only true love in this hateful world- and that is the birth of my innocent child- one that I gave life to… only to have it be like this the first 18 years of her life.”

I request  to see the odyssey reports. Submitted to court gossip file. I also want to see the GAL reports and any and all other Reports entered since April 2009- (my last access to the Courts Gossip file.) Again, I will not make it, without some reprieve financially. This is not in the BEST INTER$EST of the child (following that to broad open ended rule)

Thank you again..

Claudine

 

http://www.kscourts.org/Cases-and-Opinions/opinions/ctapp/2005/20050916/93450.htm

[further reading of this decision ALSO state that parenting time CAN NOT BE CONDITIONED upon the parents condition of  therapy as this violate constitutional rights via 3rd party ]

No. 93,450

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

In the Matter of the Marriage of

JANET BOULEY, f/k/a KIMBRELL,

Appellee,

and

WILLIAM DAVID KIMBRELL,

Appellant.

SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

 

1. Under K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 60-1616(a), a parent has a right to reasonable parenting time unless the trial court finds, after a hearing, that the exercise of parenting time would seriously endanger the child's physical, mental, moral, or emotional health.

K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 60-1616(a) creates a rebuttable presumption that a parent is entitled to reasonable parenting time and visitation. This presumption may be rebutted if, after a hearing, the trial court finds that the exercise of parenting time would seriously endanger the child's physical, mental, moral, or emotional health.

2. The fundamental rule of statutory construction to which all other rules are subordinate is that the intent of the legislature governs if that intent can be ascertained. The legislature is presumed to have expressed its intent through the language of the statutory scheme it enacted. When a statute is plain and unambiguous, the court must give effect to the intention of the legislature as expressed rather than determine what the law should or should not be.

3. Orders which condition parenting time and visitation upon a minor child's desires to see a parent give a minor child the authority to determine parenting time and can have the effect of denying parenting time altogether.

4. Among the factors that must be considered when determining the issue of child custody, residency, and parenting time under K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 60-1610(a)(3)(B) and K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 60-1616(a), the trial court must look at the desires of a minor child as to the child's custody or residency. The child's wishes as to custody, residency, and parenting time and visitation cannot be the exclusive factor relied upon by the trial court in determining parenting time.

Appeal from Douglas District Court; JEAN F. SHEPHERD, judge. Opinion filed September 16, 2005. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.

GREEN, J.: William David Kimbrell (David) appeals the trial court's decision regarding parenting time with his 16-year-old son Evan Kimbrell.

The issue in this case is whether the trial court can condition a noncustodial parent's right to parenting time with his or her minor child upon the desires of the child. We determine that this cannot be done. K.S.A. 2004 Supp. 60-1616(a) makes it clear that a parent has a right to reasonable parenting time with his or her minor child "unless the court finds, after a hearing, that the exercise of parenting time would seriously endanger the child's physical, mental, moral or emotional health." Conditioning parenting time on the wishes of a minor child improperly gives the child the authority to determine a noncustodial parent's rights to parenting time and visitation and can have the effect of completely denying the noncustodial parent's rights to parenting time.

Under the facts of this case, we determine that in the absence of a finding that parenting time "would seriously endanger the child's physical, mental, moral or emotional health," the trial court must set a reasonable and specific schedule for David's parenting time with Evan. Accordingly, we reverse in part and remand to the trial court with directions to either determine an appropriate and reasonable parenting time and visitation schedule or make the required statutory finding that the exercise of parenting time in this case would seriously endanger the child's physical, mental, moral, or emotional health

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] A Human Rights Issue-Custodial Justice.

Permalink

SIN BY SILENCE | An educational resource on DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; BUT where is the part about how BATTERERS and ABUSERS often get CUSTODY?

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] A Human Rights Issue-Custodial Justice.

Permalink

 

Looks good -- but where is the part about how batterers and abusers often get custody,

the years of exhausting and financially back-breaking litigation, the damage to the children, etc?

==============================

One in four American women will experience domestic violence in her lifetime. October was Domestic Violence Awareness Month, which aims to educate the public about ending the cycle of violence - something that the Convicted Women Against Abuse (CWAA), the first group initiated and led by inmates in the US prison system, has been doing since 1989. 

WMM new release SIN BY SILENCE by Olivia Klaus profiles the extraordinary women of CWAA, who have worked from behind prison walls to shatter misconceptions and change laws for battered women. This essential tool is the most comprehensive educational resource available on domestic violence and features more than two hours of bonus discussion videos, including:

* Violence and Abuse: What is Abuse?, Warning Signs, Why She Stays, A Batterer's Perspective, and more

* Law Enforcement and Corrections: Interviews with law enforcement leaders on their response to domestic violence and inmate and staff perspectives on the prison system

* Interviews with experts on abusive relationships

* Legal Aspects: CWAA founder Brenda Clubine's full hearing and interviews with a former juror and expert witness

"A powerful and compelling movie about injustice... Brenda['s] intelligence, passion, and determination to keep working until all battered women are released is deeply inspiring."- Nancy Lemon, J.D.; Author, Domestic Violence Law; Lecturer, Berkeley Law

View Trailer or learn more: http://www.wmm.com/filmcatalog/pages/c759.shtml

WMM is offering customers who purchase SIN BY SILENCE at full price any of the titles in the Ending the Silence: Violence Against Women collection for only $99. Related titles in this special collection include:

* LOVE, HONOUR & DISOBEY - Reveals domestic violence issues in Britain's black and ethnic minority communities through a group of women who have been working to combat abuse.

* VOICES HEARD SISTERS UNSEEN - An important call for multi-issue activism and an integrated response to services for battered women.

View full collection of films here: http://www.wmm.com/filmcatalog/special_collections.shtml#collect11

Take advantage of this email-only offer before December 31, 2009. Email orders@wmm.com or call 212.925.0606 x360 and mention promo code SINB09L. Sorry, no web orders with this offer.

Sincerely,

Stephanie Houghton

WOMEN MAKE MOVIES

Tel 212.925.0606 ext. 312

sh@wmm.com | www.wmm.com

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] A Human Rights Issue-Custodial Justice.

Permalink