16.3.10

NCADV and the Pixel Project

 

Important Information for NCADV Supporters

Dear NCADV Members and Supporters:
We ask for you to come together and VOTE for The Pixel Project's campaign against Violence Against Women in the Ashoka Changemakers contest, where they are awarding $5K to the most innovative solution to raise awareness about gender-based violence. With your help, we can continue to spread our message globally. 

We have less than 24 HOURS to get in as many votes as possible to make it through to the finals. There are over 100 ideas/organisations competing for this prize. Voting ends on on 17 March 2010.
Please take a minute of your time to follow the voting instructions below and show your support for ending Violence Against Women worldwide:
Click on our entry here:

http://www.changemakers.com/en-us/node/69867 Create your profile by clicking the top right corner of their homepage
Enter your name and e-mail, then click Create New Account
Your new log in and password will be e-mailed to you
Check your e-mail and click the link to confirm your account
Change your password and get ready to vote!
Come back to this email and click on our entry again here http://www.changemakers.com/en-us/node/69867  Give The Pixel Project a "Thumbs Up" on the right to vote your support!

THE SECOND PIXEL PROJECT WEEKEND WEBINAR


UNIFEM'S 'SAY NO - UNITE' CAMPAIGN COORDINATOR SPEAKS ABOUT GLOBAL ACTIONS TO END VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN
The Pixel Project (

http://www.thepixelproject.net) is pleased to announce that the second Pixel Project Weekend Webinar will be presented by the United Nations Development Fund For Women (UNIFEM)'s "Say NO - UNiTE" campaign coordinator, Urjasi Rudra. This webinar will take place at 6pm EST on Saturday 27 March 2010.

Ms Rudra will discuss 'Say NO's campaign to raise 1 million grassroots actions to end Violence Against Women (VAW) by November 2010 and their programme for International Women's Day. She will also be taking questions about 'Say NO' initiatives happening worldwide as well as how to get started with stopping VAW in YOUR community.

Each webinar participant will be counted as 1 "action" towards "Say NO"s campaign. Participants are encouraged to register via The Pixel Project's website's Community Buzz section or The Pixel Project's Webinar 'Action' page at http://www.saynotoviolence.org to help the organisers count you in.

This free, interactive event is hosted by UStream (http://www.UStream.tv) and will be streamed via The Pixel Project's virtual Webinar room (http://www.thepixelproject.net/community-buzz/weekend-webinar-series/).

The Pixel Project is a global volunteer-led Internet-based nonprofit whose mission is to take fund-and-awareness raising for the VAW cause into the 21st Century by delivering innovative, powerful viral campaigns across online channels including social media.


NCADV's and NOMAS' Collaborative Conference on Ending Violence July 31st through August 4th, 2010


Changing Faces of the Movement:

The Hilton Anaheim (group rate: $139), Anaheim, CA
Join NCADV, NOMAS and hundreds of survivors, advocates, activists, service providers and allies for this critical conference as we examine the societal factors that perpetuate violence and propose effective solutions to bring about its end.

REGISTER HERE
Please click here for detailed conference information

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

REDUX: Maryland House Judiciary Committee -- Vote these people out of office; and... is Frank M Conaway, Jr. a DV perp protecting himself?

From: justice’s posterous

"Maryland House Judiciary Committee wrongly killed a bill on Thursday that would have... brought Maryland into conformance with the practices of every other state in the country."http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/03/06/AR2010030601948.html

Is FRANK M. CONAWAY, Jr., one of the Committee members a domestic violence perp himself?

  See http://citypaper.com/news/story.asp?id=12819 THAT would explain a lot!

[photo, Frank M. Conaway, Jr., State Delegate]

FRANK M. CONAWAY, JR.
Democrat, District 40, Baltimore City

Curtis S. Anderson (D-Baltimore)
Benjamin S. Barnes (D-Prince George's)
Jill P. Carter (D-Baltimore)
Frank M. Conaway Jr. (D-Baltimore)
Donald H. Dwyer Jr. (R-Anne Arundel)
William J. Frank (R-Baltimore County)
J.B. Jennings (R-Baltimore County)
Kevin Kelly (D-Allegany)
Kevin Kelly (D-Allegany)
Gerron S. Levi (D-Prince George's)
Tony McConkey (R-Anne Arundel)
Victor R. Ramirez (D-Prince George's)
Samuel I. Rosenberg (D-Baltimore)
Todd L. Schuler (D-Baltimore County)
Luiz R.S. Simmons (D-Montgomery)
Michael D. Smigiel Sr. (R-C

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

MD Del. Frank M Conway Jr- A Batterer, twice hospitalized for being a ‘danger to self and others’ puts wife face through plate glass, Orders of protection remain 8 years later is dubbed THE DISTINGUISHED GENTLEMAN

I shit you not’’ wth is a ‘gentle-man’ who throws his wife face first through a plate glass window??

and why in the hell is he allowed to KILL a Maryland House Bill enabling Orders of Protection??

His wife met the absolute ‘clear and convincing evidence’ for ‘protection’ amazing as it is now- you have to end up dead or almost dead- in the State of MD.

WTG  rising star! See what this rising star had done as a Maryland Legislature

here:

Dump Frank M. Conaway Jr.

 

Be Afraid- Be very afraid

protect the women and children of Maryland- it is OPEN Season on them.

http://citypaper.com/news/story.asp?id=12819

Star Power

Frank M. Conaway Jr. Won an Election, Baggage and All

JOHN ELLSBERRY

THE DISTINGUISHED GENTLEMAN: Frank Conaway Jr. is up for one of three 40th District delegate seats despite various personal problems.

Email this Story Print-ready version leave a comment

By Van Smith |

STATE DELEGATE CANDIDATE FRANK MELVIN CONAWAY JR., who with 5,889 votes was the top vote-getter in the 40th District Democratic primary in September, doesn't want this story published. His father, Baltimore City Clerk of the Circuit Court Frank M. Conaway Sr., doesn't either. In separate interviews, both used the same, emphatic words: "You don'thave to write the story."

The story, though, may be of interest for 40th District voters, who on Nov. 7 will decide which three of the four candidates will go to Annapolis to represent approximately 110,000 city residents living from Pimlico and Rosemont to Woodberry and Mount Vernon. Simply put, Conaway Jr. isn't a delegate yet, but he likely will be soon--despite having a decidedly thin résumé and embarrassing problems: a drug convict chairs his campaign committee, and his wife swore in 2003 that Conaway Jr. is mentally ill and abusive, prompting Baltimore County courts to step in for her protection.

Conaway Jr.'s campaign-finance committee is chaired by Adonis Sanchez Johnson, 26, who in 2003 was convicted for possessing six quarter-sized chunks of crack cocaine with a street value of several hundred dollars. He received an 18-month suspended sentence and 18 months of supervised probation. At his sentencing, court records show, Johnson was an unemployed community-college student who previously worked construction.

Conaway Jr.'s longtime wife, Latesa Elaine Thomas, 44, has had a Baltimore County domestic-violence protective order against her husband for more than three years. The order, dated Aug. 25, 2003, states that Conaway Jr. "threatened to kill" Thomas, placing her "in fear of imminent serious bodily harm," and that "one year ago [he] pushed her face through back door window." Thomas also convinced the court that Conaway Jr., 43, was a threat to himself and others as a diagnosed sufferer of bipolar disorder who had stopped taking his prescribed medications, so the court ordered police escorts to deliver Conaway Jr. to two emergency hospital evaluations in the summer of 2003. Thomas is in the process of divorcing Conaway Jr.

"We knew this day would come," Conaway Jr. says. It's an unseasonably warm early-October afternoon, and he's standing at the foot of the Battle Monument, in the middle of Calvert Street between the two circuit courthouses. "Somebody's going to ask that question," he remarks, "and it's none of your business." At the time, City Paper did not know what had happened to prompt the protection order.

Conaway Jr. dismisses the drug conviction of his committee chairman by asking, "Can't a guy get a second chance?" He remarks that "in order to be one of the people, you have to help the people. I gave a person a chance."

Conaway Sr., when asked about Johnson's criminal record and committee chairmanship, says simply that "it is what it is." Attempts to reach Johnson were unsuccessful.

Bringing up Conaway Jr.'s own court record prompts the candidate to assume a don't-go-there attitude. "My children's mother is a decent woman," he says. "That's all you need to know. People understand that things happen between man and woman and the rearing of children."

Conaway Sr., interviewed later over the phone after his son's domestic violence record had been examined, says, "I don't know about [Conaway Jr.'s] diagnosed disorder." He adds that he doesn't "get into [his children's] marital affairs" and therefore was unaware of the domestic-violence issues. He cautions that his son once took his wife to court, too, so "you should take what she says with a grain of salt."

In addition to the injuries described in the protective order, Thomas, in her sworn statement in the case, mentioned a "tooth chip" and "bruises all over the body." She wrote that Conaway Jr. was "having a bi-polar accident. He has not taken his medicine for several months." She asked the court to help, writing that she and the three children she's had with Conaway Jr. are "living in fear" because "he is bi-polar and I can't deal or control his behavior," which she described as "unstable," "talking threats, keeping son in garage in fear. My entire family is afraid. He is in a manic state and is unreasonable."

Bipolar disorder, which is also known as manic-depressive illness, is described by the National Institute of Mental Health as "a brain disorder that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, and ability to function" that "can result in damaged relationships, poor job or school performance, and even suicide." It estimates that 2.6 percent of the U.S. adult population suffers from the biochemical illness. In September, the Harvard Medical School published a NIMH-funded study that found that the economic impact of bipolar disorder is measurable: "each U.S. worker with bipolar disorder averaged 65.5 lost workdays in a year." But it is treatable with medication--as long as sufferers stay on their medication.

Keeping on the medication, Thomas swore to the court, was what Conaway Jr. failed to do. The result was abuse allegations severe enough for the court to order him to stay away from his wife, children, and in-laws, and their respective homes, schools, and workplaces, or be charged with a misdemeanor crime that could bring jail time.

In the ongoing divorce case, Thomas no longer alleges abuse by her husband, and asks for divorce on the grounds that they've been separated since July 2003. Conaway Jr., though, brought up the issue of violence himself, writing in his response to her divorce filing that Thomas "failed to list when she was charged with domestic violence." That occurred in 1993, when Conaway Jr. swore out a complaint against her for assault, but prosecutors dropped the charge.

Conaway Sr., when informed of his daughter-in-law's sworn statements, says quietly, "I don't believe these things. I don't think he would lay a hand on her. And I know him."

Thomas initially said she would meet with a reporter for this article but then stopped returning phone calls. "I'm just an ordinary woman looking out for my children," she said during a brief phone conversation.

Conaway Jr. is a mail clerk in the Baltimore City Municipal Post Office, a job he says he's had for about three years. For about six or seven years before that, he says he worked for his father's travel agency. Back in the 1980s for three or four years, he says he had an insurance broker's license while working for Conaway Sr.'s now-defunct insurance business. In the meantime, Conaway Jr. says he received an education--three years at Howard University, one year at Morgan State University, then three years at Sojourner-Douglass College, graduating in 1999 with a degree in business administration. He also wrote books, and started a replica kit-car business called "F" Dreams Inc. The business fell victim, he says, to the North American Free Trade Agreement of 1994. His book Baptist Gnostic Christian Eubonic Kundalinion Spiritual Ki Do Hermeneutic Metaphysics, which combines biblical theology and martial arts, was published in 2001, and was followed by the '04 release of his The 20 Pennies a Day Diet Plan. Both are available online.

Conaway Jr.'s political committee, which was formed in May, raised and spent exactly nothing to get him elected in the primary. Yet at the polls he bettered all others--one well-liked, well-funded incumbent (freshman legislator Marshall Goodwin) and a number of other challengers with serious jobs and respectable campaign kitties. How? Conaway Jr. explains it this way.

"I have been in this community all my life," he asserts. "I was raised up to have respect for everyone, to greet people every day--police officers, teachers, businesspeople--so every day I say good morning to people. I speak to people in the supermarkets, gas stations, whatever. That's how I know people. That's how I pulled it off, because I'm one of the people.

"I covered the whole district," he continues, defensive at the suggestion that he was a no-show candidate, often missing at primary-season events. "I went door to door, I gave out toys, I gave out whistles, I gave out brooms, I spoke at forums. I tried to tell the truth. I tried to give a different answer than just rhetoric. I separated myself from the pack, because most of the people I was running against, they sound the same. You know, they sound good, but there are no answers [when they speak]. I spoke my mind."

Conaway Sr. fills in the rest. "Everybody that gets elected gets elected by name recognition--everybody," he proclaims, explaining that voters tend not to vote for people whose names they don't know. "If you don't have it, you have to buy it, and it just so happened that [Conaway Jr.] didn't have to buy name recognition because his name was well-known."

The Conaway name has graced Baltimore ballots since the 1970s, when Conaway Sr. was himself elected a state delegate. He rose to chair the Legislative Black Caucus before his star arched into a scandalous investigation of his insurance business. By 1982, he'd vacated his seat in Annapolis and declared bankruptcy. The same year, his wife, Mary Conaway, was elected the city's register of wills, a position she's held ever since--though she's made stabs for other offices, including for Congress and mayor. Since Conaway Sr. gained the clerkship of the city Circuit Court in 1998, he's run for mayor, too. Conaway Jr.'s sister Belinda Conaway is the 7th District's city councilwoman, and just ran and lost for state Senate in the 40th District. Conaway Jr. himself tried for a City Council seat in 1999. That's a lot of Conaways on a lot of ballots over a long period of time.

In order to keep the family legacy going, Conaway Sr. started Three Bears Slate, the campaign committee that raises and spends money on any and all of the family's races for public office--including Conaway Jr.'s primary victory. Formed in July 2005, it had raised nearly $60,000 and spent nearly $50,000 as of late August.

"All of those votes for four people with so little money," Conaway Sr. says, admiring the electoral efficiency of the family machine. "It's not for power," he insists--though he allows that another organization he formed this year with a bevy of local political and business leaders, Metro Political Organization, is "about power--what else would it be?" But when it comes to the family slate and public service, "I'm in it to help people," he says.

In this case, Conaway Sr.'s help came in the form of Conaway Jr. The son, since he hasn't followed former Democratic gubernatorial candidate Doug Duncan's recent example of withdrawing after confessing to a mental-health problem, is on the November ballot along with fellow Democrats Barbara Robinson and Shawn Tarrant. Green Party candidate Jan Danforth is on the list, too. While Danforth's vote-drawing potential is as yet untested, she has made a name for herself by fighting vocally in recent years against Loyola College's decision to develop forestland in Woodberry and serving on the boards of the Greater Homewood Community Development Corp. and Jones Falls Watershed Association. If Danforth, 56, comes in fourth, Conaway Jr. will be elected, making his father proud.

"He's not going to do anything bad," Conaway Sr. predicts of his son's likely future in the state legislature. "He's fine. He's going to be a star."

Email Van Smith

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Maryland ‘Batterer’ Delegate Frank M. Conway Jr. Now we know why he ‘Killed” the Domestic Violence Bill. He is a Batterer (Baltimore, Maryland)

Just what kind of legislator opposes order of protection reform for domestic violence victims? This kind (Baltimore, Maryland)

A BATTERER (just one of many) lurk in Maryland's Pig Pen Legislature

[photo, Frank M. Conaway, Jr., State Delegate]

FRANK M. CONAWAY, JR.
Democrat, District 40, Baltimore City

    House Office Building, Room 315
    6 Bladen St., Annapolis, MD 21401
    (410) 841-3189, (301) 858-3189
    1-800-492-7122, ext. 3189 (toll free)
    email:frank.conaway@house.state.md.us

 

FRANK M. CONAWAY JR. was one of many members of the Maryland Judicial Committee who crushed an effort to reform the standards under which protection orders are granted for victims of domestic violence (HB 700). This initiative was hardly a radical move--it would have simply made the standards consistent with the other 49 states. So what kind of politician votes this down? Find out.

Seems that Conaway more than meets our basic qualifying criteria as a dastardly dad.

And check out this blog:

http://dumpfrankconawayjr.blogspot.com/

http://citypaper.com/news/story.asp?id=12819

Star Power

Frank M. Conaway Jr. Won an Election, Baggage and All

John Ellsberry THE DISTINGUISHED GENTLEMAN: Frank Conaway Jr. is up for one of three 40th District delegate seats despite various personal problems.

By Van Smith Posted 10/25/2006

State delegate candidate Frank Melvin Conaway Jr., who with 5,889 votes was the top vote-getter in the 40th District Democratic primary in September, doesn't want this story published. His father, Baltimore City Clerk of the Circuit Court Frank M. Conaway Sr., doesn't either. In separate interviews, both used the same, emphatic words: "You don't have to write the story."

The story, though, may be of interest for 40th District voters, who on Nov. 7 will decide which three of the four candidates will go to Annapolis to represent approximately 110,000 city residents living from Pimlico and Rosemont to Woodberry and Mount Vernon. Simply put, Conaway Jr. isn't a delegate yet, but he likely will be soon--despite having a decidedly thin résumé and embarrassing problems:a drug convict chairs his campaign committee, and his wife swore in 2003 that Conaway Jr. is mentally ill and abusive, prompting Baltimore County courts to step in for her protection.

Conaway Jr.'s campaign-finance committee is chaired by Adonis Sanchez Johnson, 26, who in 2003 was convicted for possessing six quarter-sized chunks of crack cocaine with a street value of several hundred dollars. He received an 18-month suspended sentence and 18 months of supervised probation. At his sentencing, court records show, Johnson was an unemployed community-college student who previously worked construction.

Conaway Jr.'s longtime wife, Latesa Elaine Thomas, 44, has had a Baltimore County domestic-violence protective order against her husband for more than three years. The order, dated Aug. 25, 2003, states that Conaway Jr. "threatened to kill" Thomas, placing her "in fear of imminent serious bodily harm," and that "one year ago [he] pushed her face through back door window." Thomas also convinced the court that Conaway Jr., 43, was a threat to himself and others as a diagnosed sufferer of bipolar disorder who had stopped taking his prescribed medications, so the court ordered police escorts to deliver Conaway Jr. to two emergency hospital evaluations in the summer of 2003. Thomas is in the process of divorcing Conaway Jr.

"We knew this day would come," Conaway Jr. says. It's an unseasonably warm early-October afternoon, and he's standing at the foot of the Battle Monument, in the middle of Calvert Street between the two circuit courthouses. "Somebody's going to ask that question," he remarks, "and it's none of your business." At the time, City Paper did not know what had happened to prompt the protection order.

Conaway Jr. dismisses the drug conviction of his committee chairman by asking, "Can't a guy get a second chance?" He remarks that "in order to be one of the people, you have to help the people. I gave a person a chance."

Conaway Sr., when asked about Johnson's criminal record and committee chairmanship, says simply that "it is what it is." Attempts to reach Johnson were unsuccessful.

Bringing up Conaway Jr.'s own court record prompts the candidate to assume a don't-go-there attitude. "My children's mother is a decent woman," he says. "That's all you need to know. People understand that things happen between man and woman and the rearing of children."

Conaway Sr., interviewed later over the phone after his son's domestic violence record had been examined, says, "I don't know about [Conaway Jr.'s] diagnosed disorder." He adds that he doesn't "get into [his children's] marital affairs" and therefore was unaware of the domestic-violence issues. He cautions that his son once took his wife to court, too, so "you should take what she says with a grain of salt."

In addition to the injuries described in the protective order, Thomas, in her sworn statement in the case, mentioned a "tooth chip" and "bruises all over the body." She wrote that Conaway Jr. was "having a bi-polar accident. He has not taken his medicine for several months." She asked the court to help, writing that she and the three children she's had with Conaway Jr. are "living in fear" because "he is bi-polar and I can't deal or control his behavior," which she described as "unstable," "talking threats, keeping son in garage in fear. My entire family is afraid. He is in a manic state and is unreasonable."

Bipolar disorder, which is also known as manic-depressive illness, is described by the National Institute of Mental Health as "a brain disorder that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, and ability to function" that "can result in damaged relationships, poor job or school performance, and even suicide." It estimates that 2.6 percent of the U.S. adult population suffers from the biochemical illness. In September, the Harvard Medical School published a NIMH-funded study that found that the economic impact of bipolar disorder is measurable: "each U.S. worker with bipolar disorder averaged 65.5 lost workdays in a year." But it is treatable with medication--as long as sufferers stay on their medication.

Keeping on the medication, Thomas swore to the court, was what Conaway Jr. failed to do. The result was abuse allegations severe enough for the court to order him to stay away from his wife, children, and in-laws, and their respective homes, schools, and workplaces, or be charged with a misdemeanor crime that could bring jail time.

In the ongoing divorce case, Thomas no longer alleges abuse by her husband, and asks for divorce on the grounds that they've been separated since July 2003. Conaway Jr., though, brought up the issue of violence himself, writing in his response to her divorce filing that Thomas "failed to list when she was charged with domestic violence." That occurred in 1993, when Conaway Jr. swore out a complaint against her for assault, but prosecutors dropped the charge.

Conaway Sr., when informed of his daughter-in-law's sworn statements, says quietly, "I don't believe these things. I don't think he would lay a hand on her. And I know him."

Thomas initially said she would meet with a reporter for this article but then stopped returning phone calls. "I'm just an ordinary woman looking out for my children," she said during a brief phone conversation.

Conaway Jr. is a mail clerk in the Baltimore City Municipal Post Office, a job he says he's had for about three years. For about six or seven years before that, he says he worked for his father's travel agency. Back in the 1980s for three or four years, he says he had an insurance broker's license while working for Conaway Sr.'s now-defunct insurance business. In the meantime, Conaway Jr. says he received an education--three years at Howard University, one year at Morgan State University, then three years at Sojourner-Douglass College, graduating in 1999 with a degree in business administration. He also wrote books, and started a replica kit-car business called "F" Dreams Inc. The business fell victim, he says, to the North American Free Trade Agreement of 1994. His book Baptist Gnostic Christian Eubonic Kundalinion Spiritual Ki Do Hermeneutic Metaphysics, which combines biblical theology and martial arts, was published in 2001, and was followed by the '04 release of his The 20 Pennies a Day Diet Plan. Both are available online.

Conaway Jr.'s political committee, which was formed in May, raised and spent exactly nothing to get him elected in the primary. Yet at the polls he bettered all others--one well-liked, well-funded incumbent (freshman legislator Marshall Goodwin) and a number of other challengers with serious jobs and respectable campaign kitties. How? Conaway Jr. explains it this way.

"I have been in this community all my life," he asserts. "I was raised up to have respect for everyone, to greet people every day--police officers, teachers, businesspeople--so every day I say good morning to people. I speak to people in the supermarkets, gas stations, whatever. That's how I know people. That's how I pulled it off, because I'm one of the people.

"I covered the whole district," he continues, defensive at the suggestion that he was a no-show candidate, often missing at primary-season events. "I went door to door, I gave out toys, I gave out whistles, I gave out brooms, I spoke at forums. I tried to tell the truth. I tried to give a different answer than just rhetoric. I separated myself from the pack, because most of the people I was running against, they sound the same. You know, they sound good, but there are no answers [when they speak]. I spoke my mind."

Conaway Sr. fills in the rest. "Everybody that gets elected gets elected by name recognition--everybody," he proclaims, explaining that voters tend not to vote for people whose names they don't know. "If you don't have it, you have to buy it, and it just so happened that [Conaway Jr.] didn't have to buy name recognition because his name was well-known."

The Conaway name has graced Baltimore ballots since the 1970s, when Conaway Sr. was himself elected a state delegate. He rose to chair the Legislative Black Caucus before his star arched into a scandalous investigation of his insurance business. By 1982, he'd vacated his seat in Annapolis and declared bankruptcy. The same year, his wife, Mary Conaway, was elected the city's register of wills, a position she's held ever since--though she's made stabs for other offices, including for Congress and mayor. Since Conaway Sr. gained the clerkship of the city Circuit Court in 1998, he's run for mayor, too. Conaway Jr.'s sister Belinda Conaway is the 7th District's city councilwoman, and just ran and lost for state Senate in the 40th District. Conaway Jr. himself tried for a City Council seat in 1999. That's a lot of Conaways on a lot of ballots over a long period of time.

In order to keep the family legacy going, Conaway Sr. started Three Bears Slate, the campaign committee that raises and spends money on any and all of the family's races for public office--including Conaway Jr.'s primary victory. Formed in July 2005, it had raised nearly $60,000 and spent nearly $50,000 as of late August.

"All of those votes for four people with so little money," Conaway Sr. says, admiring the electoral efficiency of the family machine. "It's not for power," he insists--though he allows that another organization he formed this year with a bevy of local political and business leaders, Metro Political Organization, is "about power--what else would it be?" But when it comes to the family slate and public service, "I'm in it to help people," he says.

In this case, Conaway Sr.'s help came in the form of Conaway Jr. The son, since he hasn't followed former Democratic gubernatorial candidate Doug Duncan's recent example of withdrawing after confessing to a mental-health problem, is on the November ballot along with fellow Democrats Barbara Robinson and Shawn Tarrant. Green Party candidate Jan Danforth is on the list, too. While Danforth's vote-drawing potential is as yet untested, she has made a name for herself by fighting vocally in recent years against Loyola College's decision to develop forestland in Woodberry and serving on the boards of the Greater Homewood Community Development Corp. and Jones Falls Watershed Association. If Danforth, 56, comes in fourth, Conaway Jr. will be elected, making his father proud.

"He's not going to do anything bad," Conaway Sr. predicts of his son's likely future in the state legislature. "He's fine. He's going to be a star."

Email Van Smith

Labels: bipolar disorder, drugs/alcohol, DV, Maryland, mental illness,Order of Protection

 

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

FaceBook Cell Terrorists: Jim Framedfather & Mark K Godbey are at it again

 A preamble to last nights  Last Nights conversation: do these cell terrorists know that ANY thing they put on the web is OPEN??? they don't care- they care ONLY about themselves.. Mark Godbey must have lost another attempt to torture his wife and child.

Dossier: Mark K Godbey

Mark_K_Godbey

Mark K Godbey has a long history of frivolous litigation against his ex wife.  Despite numerous restraining orders made against him, he continued to persue her through the courts.   He was sentenced for contempt on two occasions.

Alike most advocates for shared parenting, he publicly claims to promote that children are better off with both parents and privately cheers on cases where the child has been deprived of the mother:

markgodbeyfathersonly

Filed under: Fathers Rights | Tagged: Mark Godbey, Mark K Godbey, Mark Kevin Godbey | 1 Comment »

 Last Nights conversation: Mark Godbey must have lost another attempt to torture his wife and child. I hope his Judge see’s this- (actually I will forward a copy to him) Time to up your meds Mark K Godbey

Jim Framedfather If I seem a bit scarce, I have stepped back for a while. Sometimes you have to in order to re-charge and re-group mentally and spiritually..........

11 hours ago · Comment ·Like

Mark Godbey and Mary Cadei Johnson like this.

Mary Cadei Johnson

Mary Cadei Johnson

I totally understand!:) Take care of yourself Jim

11 hours ago

Chauncy Richard

Chauncy Richard

Welcome back jim :)

11 hours ago

Theresa Martin

Theresa Martin

Take time for you. YOU are the most important person. This is what I call 'self-talk' 8}

10 hours ago

Tawni Roark

Tawni Roark

As we all need to sometimes! Good idea, Jim time!

9 hours ago

Mark Godbey

Mark Godbey

For the past week, I have done nothing but Farmville. My vacation from thinking about my children, and other problems.... recharging the batteries.

8 hours ago

Tawni Roark

Tawni Roark

CAN'T WAIT FOR YOU both TO COME OUT swinging! BOTH OF U RE-CHARGED -OMG! HELL HATH NO FURY LIKE A BROTHER OR SISTER SCORN! nice to know your still "in there if I or other's NEED you both" ! YOU BOTH ARE WELL RESPECTED MEN!

8 hours ago

Mick Karabegovic

Mick Karabegovic

god to hear you breathing Jim ;)

7 hours ago

Mick Karabegovic

Mick Karabegovic

and Mark of course

7 hours ago

Lane Isaac

Lane Isaac

You have to recharge!! It is important to take of you!! I will take the torch from you!! You are a valued friend!! I have quit my third job and have a little time to bring forth some facts!!

5 hours ago

Mark Godbey

Mark Godbey

Also, I am studying to be a Paralegal or a Legal Investigator working within Family Law. Concentrated coursework for next 7 weeks. I have been told more than once, the way to combat evil is one child at a time. I intend to ferret out those who make False Allegations, and alienate children. Since the police wont' enforce laws that protect Parental Abductions, I will make that my mission. Fuck law enforcement.

about an hour ago

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

15.3.10

New Study Commissioned by the Australian Government

     

    Responding to intimate partner violence victimization: Effective options for help-seeking

    Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice no. 389

    Silke Meyer

    ISSN 1836-2206

    Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology, March 2010

  • Download paper (pdf 1.2 MB)

  • view paper

    • Abstract

      Approximately one in four women in most Western nations are at risk of becoming a victim of intimate partner violence (IPV). Interventions for IPV victims have shown to be significant in preventing negative outcomes.

      Using data from the International Violence Against Women Survey, this paper examines predictors of help-seeking by IPV victims and considers whether such responses are influenced by the severity of abuse experienced.

      Many IPV victims seek assistance informally from family and friends in the first instance and that experience may affect subsequent attempts to seek help from more formal sources.

      This study found that victims of IPV are more likely to explore formal avenues of support when married to the abusive partner, have children who have witnessed incidents of abuse, have used drugs or alcohol to cope with abuse and where the abusive partner has previously receive d counseling for his behavior.

      It was found that in cases where the victim had experienced more severe types of abuse, and/or if they felt their life had been threatened during the most recent incident, there was a significantly increased likelihood of formal help-seeking.

      Collectively, these findings can inform the enhancement of current responses made by formal sources of support to better accommodate the needs of IPV victims and their children.

      Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

      Why "Therapeutic Jurisprudence" Must Be -- and Will Be -- Eliminated From Our Family Courts standards and practices in child custody evaluations

      standards and practices in child custody evaluations

      One of the problems with the rise of therapeutic jurisprudence and the placement of non-legal systems into the courts is the subtle denigration of long-established precepts of lawyer independence and due process. One of the multiple ways this happens in the family courts is through the common development of multidisciplinary collegial relationships and business referral.

      The conflict arises because most lawyers represent different clients taking different sides in different cases (sometimes the wife, sometimes the husband, sometimes the "good guy", sometimes the "bad guy", etc.). If a lawyer coming into a case runs up against an expert he has a referral or employment relationship with in other cases, and that expert takes an adverse position to the lawyer's client in the new case, the lawyer will have a very difficult time adequately representing his client. Appropriate representation may require the lawyer to strenuously object to an expert's testimony -- or even the expert himself. But if the lawyer needs the good will and cooperation of the expert in connection with the lawyer's other clients' pending cases, he cannot do that because he may put those other cases at risk.

      Lawyers in these positions will be tempted to rationalize to themselves, as well as maintain the posture in the community at large, that the expert's opinions, even when they are adverse to his client, are scientifically valid -- even when they may not be, even if they are deeply flawed or completely bogus. These lawyers may rationalize to themselves that the validity of the science is not their responsibility because, after all, lawyers are not "scientists".

      The lawyer who naively or purposefully steps down the path of multidisciplinary practice, regularly exchanging referrals and engaging in other close associations with nonlawyer case participants (a practice that is encouraged by mixed-discipline organizations such as the AFCC under the Orwellian assumption that this somehow fosters justice and works to "improve" the courts) in fact has sold his professional soul to the devil -- literally.

      The lawyer and these other participants in the system have different roles. When lawyers directly hire paralegals, experts, and others to assist them, there is not as much of a problem, even when these individuals are independent contractors. First, their work is covered by attorney work product unless and until they testify. Second, because they were hired by the lawyer, they are subject to the same conflict of interest rules as the lawyer is, as far as their involvement in other cases and with other people. That is not the case with "independent" experts, however. Custody evaluators and guardians ad litem who render opinions "for the court", so-called "court-appointed experts", are a very different matter.

      The conflict of interest problems are inherent in the nature of the association. They exist even when there is no explicit association or referral relationship. They are not the same as having a professional relationship with another lawyer who regularly may be on the opposing side of a case, because unlike the lawyer colleague, these individuals are case participants -- witnesses or even parties. They are not akin to neutral judges or magistrates, the bailiffs or other courthouse personnel. None of these truly neutral courthouse persons advocates for a position in a case, testifies as a witness, or participates as a party proper (as do some GALs).

      The routine broad involvement of these expert witnesses must be recognized by the legal profession as the egregious misjudgment it is, as well as fostering ethical violations that must be addressed by state bar ethics rules.

      Joseph Goldberg and the network of PAS cross-referral relationshipsIronically, the problem is worse for lawyers who are not ideologues, because these lawyers are more likely to advocate for different client perspectives. The legal community, even in urban areas, is limited and often close-knit. Lawyers in the same area of practice regularly encounter each other in different cases. The pool of forensic experts and GALs tends to be even smaller. The repeated association time and again of these specialists in cases means that at any time and from time to time any given one of them may show up on the "wrong side" of a lawyer's case -- and simultaneously also be on the "right side" of other of the lawyer's cases, whether as hired expert or court-appointed expert. This creates many of the same dilemmas that ordinary client conflict-of-interest issues do.

      Contrary to the rationalizing rhetoric, court-appointed evaluators and opining GALs are not neutral participants in the system. Even if they initially are hired under that rubric, once their reports are rendered, and their opinions formed and ready to be given, they have become advocates for one or the other side or issue. Thus, at a point, they are, just as any party would be, pointedly in favor of certain outcomes, and adverse to others.

      What does the lawyer do when an expert the lawyer is relying on in one case takes a similar position that lacks scientific merit against another of the same lawyer's clients in another case. Because the expert and the lawyer have been, are currently, or will be in cahoots in other cases, the lawyer is placed into a conflict, unable zealously to discredit the expert when that is necessary to protect his client. Bar ethics rules must address this. (The experts themselves have the same temptation to manipulate their opinions to please those lawyers with whom they have ongoing relationships and receive referrals -- contributing to yet more corruption of the system.)

      Court appointed witnesses and parties in other people's private civil cases are interlopers in the justice system and must be excised. The very integrity of the justice system is at stake. To the extent well-meaning individuals did not fathom the repercussions, and were swayed by sweet-sounding ideas that simply do not work well in practice, and bought into the rhetoric originating in the psychology trade promotion organizations, it's time for a regroup and an honest reappraisal.

      Lawyers are advocates. If an expert's position supports the lawyer's client, the lawyer is going to accept that opinion and put it forward in the interests of his client's case. But when the lawyer encounters the very same scientifically meritless position by the same expert in a case in which that does not favor the lawyer's client, what does the lawyer do?

      It does not take any "expert" to do a home study or investigate readily observable facts. The proof of that is how often the court-hired opiners are not specialists but lawyers and laypersons. The taint is especially egregious when there is a perception of need for psychological "experts", however, because, unlike other kinds of experts, the field of applied psychology is overrun with political machinations, nonsensical theories, half-baked ideas, and outright misrepresentations. Too often it's not close to "science" and it's not technical knowledge either. Much of the time, it's more akin to an expertise in astrology, or theology -- high familiarity with complicated ideas and methods of calculating answers, and the body of literature that discusses all of this, but otherwise somewhere between unhelpful and misleading when it comes to ascertaining the facts.

      Unlike lawyers in many other areas of practice, who may retain their clients for years, family lawyers typically need a steady stream of new one-shot clients. In addition, family lawyers also tend to work in smaller firms. So they value those who send them business. Too many family lawyers, perhaps without recognizing or acknowledging the subtle conflicts of interest that have caused their discomfort and unwillingness adequately to represent some of their clients in some of their cases, in fact have sacrificed these clients on the altar of maintaining their professional relationships, associations, and referral sources.

      In such circumstances, some busy family lawyers will admit to feeling burnout, but they've rationalized their unwillingness to zealously advocate for their clients, as well as their discomfort, as perhaps stemming from the "high conflict" created by unreasonable clients, or the high emotional toll their cases are taking on them. Others retain their enthusiasm by becoming extremist ideologues and proponents of bad science, taking only cases in which they will not encounter these conflicts and suspending their judgment and integrity in the interests of churning cases and making money. For example, this is seen among lawyers who assert in case after case with different facts that their clients have been the victims of "parental alienation". (The father's rights advocates also would lay this charge on the anti-abuse industry.) The lawyer resolves the cognitive dissonance by committing to propositions outside of law and outside of the lawyer's academic expertise, and -- maintaining a deliberate self-serving ignorance -- carries these ideas into the media of the legal field. This conveniently furthers the propagation of the bad science, and it inappropriately encourages lawyers to adopt ideological positions of dubious merit.

      Some lawyers caught in this vortex justify their lack of vigorous representation, and the coerced settlements they've foisted on some clients as really hailing from a motivation and concern for the best interests of children, or for taking a reasonable settlement position, or the high road, or as their commitment to helping people to just get along. They attempt to redefine their jobs, paternalistically, as dictators who must "control" their clients, not as agents for them. They may profess to themselves and each other and everyone else around a great affinity for mediation and therapy and collaborative resolution, and all manner of therapeutic jurisprudence in the interests of everyone, and similar specious posturing, encouraged in their self-delusion by a steady drip of MHP literature -- and new referral retainers. This kind of thing is just not as pervasive in other areas of the law, no matter how heated the conflicts get, and it's one substantial reason the public has such a generally dim view of the family courts and family lawyers. "Therapeutic jurisprudence" is a primary reason the family courts are seen as not working, unjust, and broken.

      Given that clients are entitled to their choice of attorneys, and are entitled to independent, unconflicted agents at law who are committed to furthering their interests and goals (as the client, not the attorney, has defined them), one immediately viable solution is a rule of disqualification of any GAL or forensic expert who previously has been associated in any case with either of the lawyers in that case, and the striking and nullification of all testimony and reports of that expert, no matter at what stage of a case the lawyer is hired and may enter the case.

      It also is time to substantially limit the use of forensic experts and GALs in family court altogether because for the most part, MHPs, including child custody evaluators and their related forensic offshoots, in fact are unneeded, unhelpful, and undesirable in the vast majority of child custody cases.

      liz 01-08-08

      Elizabeth J. Kates, Esq.

      Pompano Beach, Florida

      Information on these webpages is from ongoing research being conducted by the National Network on Family Law Policy, and by numerous scholars, professionals, and others around the United States who are investigating the workings of our justice system. For more information, contact sarah.

      Rethinking the Assumptions of Therapeutic Jurisprudence in the Family Courts

      Custody Evaluator Quotes

      Is Collaborative Law a Good Idea? Notes on Issues and Ethics

      Other articles of interest:

      The March issue of the Florida Bar Journal contains an article bolstering the position that referral relationships are indeed business relationships. See Business Is Business: Recognizing Referral Relationships as Legitimate Business InterestsProtectable by Restrictive Covenants in Florida, by Charles A. Carlson and Amy E. Stoll

      An RSVP to Professor Wexler's Warm TJ Invitation: Unable to Join You, by Prof. Mae C. Quinn

      Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Embracing a Tainted Ideal, by Arthur G. Christean

      Punishing Medical Experts for Unethical Testimony: A Step in the Right Direction or a Step too Far? by David B. Resnik, J.D., Ph.D.

      Whores of the Court: The Fraud of Psychiatric Testimony and the Rape of American Justice, by Margaret Hagen FREEdownload from Prof. Hagen's website,