24.11.09

Utilizing Studies on Degus May Impair Fathers' Brain Development: by Randi James

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Battered Mothers Rights - A Human Rights Issue.

Permalink

Friday

Utilizing Studies on Degus May Impair Fathers' Brain Development by Randi James

I'm sorry, but when I discovered that father's rights supporters were excited about a study utilizing Degus, I had to crack up. What a bunch of bull. WTF is a Degu?

The implications behind the research are that father-absence may cause neurological deficiencies. Sounds so exciting when you need to boost your self-esteem and prove your usefulness.

This Is Your Brain Without Dad

By Shirley S Wang

October 27th 2009

Conventional wisdom holds that two parents are better than one. Scientists are now finding that growing up without a father actually changes the way your brain develops.

German biologist Anna Katharina Braun and others are conducting research on animals that are typically raised by two parents, in the hopes of better understanding the impact on humans of being raised by a single parent. Dr. Braun's work focuses on degus, small rodents related to guinea pigs and chinchillas, because mother and father degus naturally raise their babies together.

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Stop.

What does raising babies together mean/entail?

How long do they raise their babies together?

When deprived of their father, the degu pups exhibit both short- and long-term changes in nerve-cell growth in different regions of the brain...Their preliminary analysis indicates that fatherless degu pups exhibit more aggressive and impulsive behavior than pups raised by two parents.

Stop.

And what happened when degus were deprived of their mother?

What type of behavior qualified as more aggressive and impulsive?

Were these behaviors maladaptive?

In the long term, was this change beneficial, or harmful?

Dr. Braun and her colleagues found that in the two-parent families, the degu mothers and fathers cared for their pups in similar ways, including sleeping next to or crouching over them, licking and grooming them, and playing with them. The fathers even exhibited a "nursing-type" position.

When the mother was a single parent, the frequency of her interactions with her pups didn't change much, which means that those pups experienced significantly less touching and interaction than those with two parents.

In similar ways, but did they do so in similar quantity?

If the father was a single parent, could he perform those same activities?

If the father was absent, were there no other degus available to lick and groom the pups?

Dr. Braun's group found that at 21 days, the fatherless animals had less dense dendritic spines compared to animals raised by both parents, though they "caught up" by day 90. However, the length of some types of dendrites was significantly shorter in some parts of the brain, even in adulthood, in fatherless animals.

How did the dendritic spines catch up?

Was the length of the spines directly attributable to father-absence?

A preliminary analysis of the degus' behavior showed that fatherless animals seemed to have a lack of impulse control, Dr. Braun says. And, when they played with siblings, they engaged in more play-fighting or aggressive behavior.

Lack of impulse control as evidenced by what--more play-fighting and aggressive behavior with the siblings?

How is this not a compensation for less touch, period, versus it being specific to father-absence?

In a separate study in Dr. Braun's lab conducted by post-doctoral researcher Joerg Bock, degu pups were removed from their caregivers for one hour a day. Just this small amount of stress leads the pups to exhibit more hyperactive behaviors and less focused attention, compared to those who aren't separated, Dr. Braun says. They also exhibit changes in their brain.

Caregivers?

Are we to assume that the results would be the same if the mother was removed?

The basic wiring between the brain regions in the degus is the same as in humans, and the nerve cells are identical in their function. "So on that level we can assume that what happens in the animal's brain when it's raised in an impoverished environment ... should be very similar to what happens in our children's brain," Dr. Braun says.

On that level? What about other levels?

Key words: "impoverished environment."

"The minute you get into stuff with extensive social and environmental components, the social differences between humans and animals are massive," says Simon Chapple, a senior economist in the social policy division of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the 30-country grouping of the world's largest economies.

It remains an "open verdict" whether single parenthood causes these bad outcomes, or is merely associated with them, says Dr. Chapple.

Booyah!

Dr. Braun's goal for future research is to figure out whether degu pups' brains can be rewired by introducing a substitute caregiver, such as a grandmother, or whether other social and emotional enrichment can help "repair" the fatherless pups, she says. Human children may be sent to day care, for instance, which can help them form stable friendships with their peers and other adults.

Question and answer completed. Human children. Human. Not Degus.

Want to know what I found out about Degus?

When they are horny, the boys get all crazy with eachother:

During the annual breeding season, male-male aggression temporarily increases.

They are really selfish, but they may like group sex:

Males exclude other males from their burrow and monopolize the females (usually 2 to 4) who live there.

They have something in common with R. Kelly:

Courting males often engage in mutual grooming with females, and frequently perform a courtship ritual which involves wagging of the tail and trembling of the body. The male then raises a hind leg and sprays urine onto the female.

They are hardcore believers in breastfeeding:

The female subsequently expends considerable energy in gestation and lactation.

Their babies even get different teats in their mouth (maybe learned from dad)...:

Related female degus may nurse each other's young.

...because they believe in shared parenting...:

Females participate in rearing on another's young.

...but they really need their mommies:

They have an elaborate vocal repertoire, and the young need to be able to hear their mother's calls if the emotional systems if their brains are to develop properly.

They may seem a little homosexual, or, parentally alienated, at first:

they generally live in same-sex social groups until they are about 9 months old and their first breeding season occurs.

But they do have admirable behaviors:

Degus nest communally...In the laboratory, the female remains close to the pups until two weeks after birth, and males have been observed to huddle with the young during this period without instances of infanticide. In the wild, male degus may spend as much time feeding and huddling with the young as females do.

And you really shouldn't use Degus to extrapolate findings to humans:

It has been reported that pups raised in isolation in the laboratory experience severe neural and behavioral abnormalities.

Get over yourselves!

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Battered Mothers Rights - A Human Rights Issue.

Permalink

23.11.09

The OZ Pig Page

SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 2009

Christian Kelder aka ChristianJ, Cressy Tasmania

"Some woman hit me one night and I immediately hit her back. I felt no guilt over it, but everyone thought I was in the wrong. I explained that she would not have been hit had she not hit me first, but for some reason they still felt I was the one that should be charged."
Full time Misogynist, father of 4 daughters (poor girls) works or worked in a hardware shop so he's not the academic he likes to think he his, lives in Cressy, Tasmania.
Usernames: Christianj, christianj162000
http://www.geocities.com/christianj162000/main_page1.html
http://boysraisedbysinglemums.blogspot.com/ (don't pedophiles target boys raised by single mums?)
http://www.facebook.com/christian.kelder?ref=search&sid=1803194818.1883721481..1
http://web.archive.org/web/20050312122711/http://www.kittennews.com/kn_mag/05_may03mag/christianj_01.htm
http://web.archive.org/web/20040831075753/www.geocities.com/christianj162000/
http://standyourground.com/forums/index.php?action=profile;u=193;sa=showPosts;start=30
http://s432.photobucket.com/albums/qq47/christianj162000/

POSTED BY TROTTING OUT THE PIGS OF AUSTRALIA AT 11:46 PM 1 COMMENTS

LABELS: CHRISTIAN KELDER, CHRISTIANJ, CHRISTIANJ162000, CRESSY,MISOGYNIST, TASMANIA

FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2009

Tom Smith, Loser Santa Barbara CA,


"When we get power, they are going to pay. I lost numerous jobs because of them AND my kids. I'm as angry as hell with absolutely no apologies for my anger. They will of course paint us angry types in various unflattering ways to serve their purposes, but it's part of our advocacy to start getting up in their faces and not put up with thier shit. They are much worse than the so called imaginary patriarchy ever was.Tom"
"Definition of Masculism: A men’s movement ideology that advocates for the abolition of political and cultural assumptions of equality between sexes. A realistic approach to sex differences that attempts to identify those differences and how they are best expressed in the social and political melieu. Supports the establishment of a modern partriarchy and assumes that we are now living in a matriarchy."
"Assumption of Father’s Custody instead of Mother’s Custody. Father's custody will help reduce the divorce rate while encouraging a positive view of men. "
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mensrights/message/1496
http://www.geocities.com/qim/masculisttrinity.htm
http://twitterholic.com/qim/
One would assume that Tom Smith is friends with pedophile Bob Allen Bobx23456 as he is a member of his group. Tom Smith also supports pro pedophile Warren Farrell.

POSTED BY TROTTING OUT THE PIGS OF AUSTRALIA AT 6:35 PM 0 COMMENTS

LABELS: BOBX23456, MACULIST, QIM, SANTA BARBARA, TOM SMITH,WARREN FARRELL

MONDAY, AUGUST 24, 2009

John Roberts


"You know sometimes I could just punch a wall I get so mad. I really wish I did commit DV against her, she deserves it. She's taken my house, my kids and my money just who does she think she is. I supported her lifestyle for all of those years. She never had to work. I hate her."

POSTED BY TROTTING OUT THE PIGS OF AUSTRALIA AT 3:18 PM 0 COMMENTS

LABELS: JOHN ROBERTS, JOHNNYROB65

SUNDAY, AUGUST 23, 2009

Laurie Nowell Fathers Rights Reporter


Reprinted with thanks.

POSTED BY TROTTING OUT THE PIGS OF AUSTRALIA AT 9:15 PM 0 COMMENTS

LABELS: FATHERS RIGHTS, LAURIE NOWELL

TUESDAY, AUGUST 18, 2009

Terry Quinane Canberra ACT


"In cases of sole custody, wherever the sole parent enters into a defacto relationship or remarries, all child support payments should cease. The new partner who takes on a step-father role to your children should also take on the financial responsibilities, as if they were his own. In joint custody situations payments or non-payments should go on as normal.
Terry Quinane is the Child Support spokesman for the Society for the Best Interests of the Child."

http://www.certifiedmale.com.au/issue8/cssm.htm

http://web.archive.org/web/19980509034549/www.child-justice.dynamite.com.au/fcchldaf.htm

POSTED BY TROTTING OUT THE PIGS OF AUSTRALIA AT 4:35 AM 0 COMMENTS

LABELS: ACT, CANVERRA, SOCIETY FOR THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD,TERRY QUINANE

MONDAY, JULY 13, 2009

More Ross Mitchell...

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=89986919298
Ross Mitchell of Raymond Terrace set up this sham facebook group to ridicule Safe Family Law.
Why is Ross Mitchell, the subject of several AVO's not interested in Safer Family Law?

Safer Family Law Hoax
Global
Basic Info

Type:

Common Interest - Families

Description:

This group is set up to counter the hoax that is the Safer Family Law group. The Safer Family Law group are just a bunch of man haters. They claim men as the only perpetrators of violence in family law and ignore killer mothers and members who post articles like the Yeeda Topham case are blocked.

Contact Info

Email:

Office:

Here

Location:

somewhere

Newcastle, Australia

POSTED BY TROTTING OUT THE PIGS OF AUSTRALIA AT 7:04 PM 0 COMMENTS

LABELS: AVO, FACEBOOK, FLEUROMAN, RAYMOND TERRACE, ROSS MITCHELL

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 17, 2009

Michael Murphy Canada

Michael Murphy whines:

"One of the other sites associated with them ishttp://ozpigpage.blogspot.com/. On this site they do write-ups of Ozzy men's/father's rights activists which by any standard are slanderous and vile. I note it is private for the time being so maybe they got the message they are crossing over the boundary from fair comment to slander and hate. Are they misandrists. Perhaps! I would suggest to the Ozzy men's rights movement to try and uncover their identities. Then perhaps we can do an expose on who they are, their motives (as if we don't already know) and how much the Ozzy tax payers are putting out for this kind of rubbish."

I say Michael if you think the contents of this blog are slanderous and vile then you should blame the original posters for that and direct any criticisms towards them. All material on this blog comes directly from what the poster has placed on the internet themselves. I agree with you that all of it is vile, hence the necessity for this blog.

POSTED BY TROTTING OUT THE PIGS OF AUSTRALIA AT 6:12 PM 0 COMMENTS

LABELS: CANADA, MICHAEL MURPHY, VILE

 

 

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Dad arrested for DWI with 5-year-old daughter not in car seat (Patchogue, Long Island, New York) Dastardly Dads

Note: Cross posted from [worpress angelfury] A Human Rights Issue-Custodial Justice.

Permalink

Dad arrested for DWI with 5-year-old daughter not in car seat (Patchogue, Long Island, New York)

Dastardly Dads

Dad IVAN LLAGZHA has been busted for driving drunking with his 5-year-daughter--who was not in a car seat either. But he won't be facing a felony charge because Leandra's law--the recently passed NY legislation that makes it a felony to commit DWI with a minor in the car--hasn't taken affect yet. So Daddy will just get hit with a misdemeanor. Better not pull this stunt next month, though.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_crime/2009/11/21/2009-11-21_leandras_law_doesnt_apply_in_li_bust_with_kid.html

Leandra's Law doesn't apply in L.I. bust with kid

BY Wil Cruz

DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

Originally Published:Saturday, November 21st 2009, 6:10 PM

Updated: Saturday, November 21st 2009, 6:10 PM

A Long Island man was busted Saturday on charges of driving drunk with his young daughter - but he won't face a felony rap because Leandra's Law hasn't taken effect yet.

Ivan Llagzha, 36, was driving his 1997 Honda wildly in Patchogue when cops pulled him over just after 2:30 a.m.

His 5-year-old daughter Kayla was in the car and was not in a child safety seat.

She was not injured, police said.

Before her father allegedly put her in harm's way, the little girl had survived two brushes with death.

According to a 2004 newspaper article, she was born weighing just a pound and a half.

Then, when she was just 3 months old, she was almost killed by loss of oxygen during an apnea attack.

After Llagzha was arrested, the girl was turned over to her mother.

Llagzha, who lives in Patchogue, was charged with driving while intoxicated and endangering the welfare of a child, both misdemeanors.

He dodged a legal bullet because his arrest came just days after Gov. Paterson signed the anti-DWI Leandra's Law.

The law makes it a felony to drive drunk with a child 15 years or younger - but it doesn't take effect until next month.

It was inspired by the death of Leandra Rosado, 11, who was killed last month when a drunken Bronx mom got behind the wheel with a car full of kids.

wcruz@nydailynews.com

Posted by silverside at 8:42 AM

Labels: drugs/alcohol, DUI/DWI, New York

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Newer PostOlder PostHome

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Note: Cross posted from [worpress angelfury] A Human Rights Issue-Custodial Justice.

Permalink

Dad with "temporary custody" confesses to beating 18-month-old son to death

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Battered Mothers Rights - A Human Rights Issue.

Permalink

 

From Dastardly Dads

Dad with "temporary custody" confesses to beating 18-month-old son to death; he did it "because the baby wouldn't stop crying" (New Roads, Louisiana)

Dad AARON BOWMAN, who, for some unspecified reason, was awarded "tempoary custody" of his two young children, has been charged with 1st degree murder of his 18-month-old son. Dad has already confessed to the killing; seems his nose got bent out of joint because the little boy was crying. So Daddy beat him to death, the sick little sh**.

Not a word on the moronic officials who gave this creep "temporary custody." Let's see the names and some accountability!

http://www.2theadvocate.com/news/police/70731097.html

New Roads man, 28, arrested in death of his child

By SANDY DAVIS

Advocate staff writer

Published: Nov 22, 2009 - Page: 1B

New Roads police arrested the father of an 18-month-old boy Friday after the toddler was found beaten to death at his grandmother’s house last week, police said Saturday.

Aaron Bowman, 28, of New Roads, was booked into the Pointe Coupee Parish Prison on one count of first-degree murder, said New Roads Police Capt. Mark Munson on Saturday.

Bowman had temporary custody of Aaron Bowman Jr., the toddler, as well as his 2-year-old daughter, Munson said.

The toddler’s grandmother, who was not identified, called police at about 11 a.m. Wednesday, Munson said.

“When we got to her house, the baby was dead,” Munson said.

An autopsy showed that one of the baby’s legs was broken and he had been hit “with the palm of a fist” on his head, his stomach and his back, Munson said.

The child also had liver damage, he said.

“The baby died from internal bleeding,” Munson said.

The autopsy showed that the toddler received the injuries on Tuesday, he said.

Bowman first told police that the child was injured while Bowman was playing with him. Bowman said he was throwing the child in the air when the child “slipped” and fell, Munson said.

“But the injuries on the baby were not consistent with an accident like Mr. Bowman described,” Munson said. “His story was not consistent with the pathologist’s findings.”

Three police officers, Munson, Sgt. Shell Stringer, and Chief Kevin McDonald, questioned Bowman on Friday until he confessed, Munson said.

“He said he did it because the baby wouldn’t stop crying,” Munson said.

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Battered Mothers Rights - A Human Rights Issue.

Permalink

Child support idiocy and father's rights activists

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Battered Mothers Rights - A Human Rights Issue.

Permalink

Child support idiocy and father's rights activists By Glenn’s’Cult

http://glennscult.blogspot.com

Well the two go hand in hand let me tell you. First check out what the guy is saying (not highlighted portions). Petunia Commentary to follow...

Laryy Broyer (ldbroy2001@yahoo.com) says:

I'm curious if anybody has sued thier EX for making false

statements, regarding support payments. My Ex is playing games,

Gonna have to hire a lawyer etc. etc. I've been through so much

crap with this women, and her sneaky underhanded actions, continue

to surprise me.

I've got lock solid proof her accounting practices are far from

reality. There has to be away to teach her a lesson, to never again

temped to manipulate the system for personal gain.

I'm old now, and really just don't want the added stress of dealing

with this stuff anymore. 28 years of constant attacks is enough.

Gonna hire a lawyer, and be done with it. Can't afford it, but

what else can I do. All those years of stress, have taken thier toll.

Recently the company I was working for closed. They always seem to hit

you when your most vulnerable. Then thiers my son, he doesn't need this crap either, can I sue on both of our behalfs.

Larry Broyer

Well doing the math would love for you to point out to me why you have been dealing with this for TWENTY EIGHT (28) years? The longest period of time to be paiyng child support is generally 18-22 years (if you must continue through college). generally though it is 18 years of age. So an extra 10 years on top? Maybe, just maybe Lumpen Larry, it is because you did not pay what you were supposed to pay and she got a judgment for interest. Now you will be paying this for a very long time. Should have saved your self some money and aggravation. A bank would have been cheaper from which to borrow than the state.

Do we have to spell it out for these guys?

Posted by Glenn's Cult?at 6:04 PM

Labels: Child Support, Larry Broyer, ldbroy2001 at yahoo.com

2 comments:

larry said...

OK Mister mathematician, ever think the children ages range father then 12 years apart, please put your head back in the sand, see you on the food lines in a few years.

November 22, 2009 7:43 PM

Glenn's Cult? said...

Okay mr larry of the hidden blogger profile (what are you afraid of), have you ever done the math yourself? The only way for you to have any more than 18 years of child support total (or 21 depending on the laws of your state) is if you went back to your ex wife (the one you say is so awful) after your older child aged out. If you had a 17 year old and a newborn, max you would pay would be 18-21 years. Not the 28 like you are saying.

So let me explain this so someone who is not a mathematician can understand it.

You have a child who is say 12, and then you have another child and get divorced as soon as said child is conceived. You would pay support in some states for 18 years (19 if you seperate right when woman discovers pregnancy). So you would pay cs for two children for 6 years (oldest one ages out at 18). You will then have another 12-13 years for the next child until they age out. So that is a total of 18-19 years (which is the actual age of the youngest child). The ONLY way for you to have to pay more than that is if you divorced mom and had a 1 year old, then when that child was 11 you and ex got back together conceived another child and she left you again (or you left her). Then you would have already paid for 10 years and would have another 18 years to go to make it 28. But then YOU GOT BACK WITH HER. So that was YOUR CHOICE!!!

There is no other way unless (and this is the likely scenario) you fell behind in your support payments. Then you would be paying arrears and interest.

I foresee that as the likely scenario because with all the venom you spew towards your ex, I do not picture you getting back together with her for a little rendevouz. Why do I say this? because you are on a father's rights email group. And men who are FR's HATE their ex wives. And unless you are just a sex crazed fool, I cannot see you getting back with your ex wife for sex.

So there you have it. Why don't you explain how it came about that you have been paying child support for 28 years?

November 23, 2009 12:00 AM

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] Battered Mothers Rights - A Human Rights Issue.

Permalink

Canadian Blogger Attempts to Shift Focus from Father's Rights Hate Incitement

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] I will not SHUT UP , GIVE UP and I WONT go away!!.

Permalink

Monday by Randi James

Canadian Blogger Attempts to Shift Focus from Father's Rights Hate Incitement

In a classic attempt to shift the focus, a Canadian father's rights blogger, Mike Murphy, "outs" a website called MISS because:

They use the information leeched from other blogs and web pages...to publish libelous material that has criminal overtones.
The MISS website utilizes information publicly posted on the internet to compile "biographies" about the most vocal players in the father's rights movement. Yet, instead of soliciting his audience to question the information that is presented, Mike Murphy uses personal attacks and distortion to rouse his followers:
The fringe lunatic group called anonymums are up to their old games again with a new hate site but they are now going beyond the bounds of their other dim bulb men's hate sites and into the realm of criminal hate and civil libel.
The oldest trick in the book is to call into question the mental status of a woman (since he can't use the "she's a slut" tactic). In this way she cannot be seen as valid opponent because the attention has been deflected from information that is indeed factual:
It is my belief the person doing this may be suffering from a serious personality disorder and it is of concern...This is, I believe, a female who belongs to a group on the lunatic fringe of mothers who have lost custody of their children and some of whom have serious personality disorders based on the hate sites against men they operate.
Has he attempted to verify or dispute the accuracy of the information?:
Please note one of the people this woman has slandered is an American Judge and I will forward my information to him in case he wishes to have the FBI investigate.
Upon a simple Google search, it becomes evident that none of this information is slander when it originates from documents not created by the website's authors.
Mike Murphy also attempts to silence the MISS site:
I have sent the following off to the Australian Federal Police, the ISP of the cyber stalker from Melbourne in OZ, shown below and will follow up with a legal letter to Wordpress the owners of the blogs.
This is not new. Mike Murphy does have a history of publishing what he believes to be his opponent's IP addresses and other sensitive information. Coincidentally, he has also done the similar things to his ex-wife--information which also can be found throughout the internet, courtesy of him. The only thing that has been found to be criminal, are the actual actions of Mike Murphy and the others listed on the MISS website.
If Mike Murphy is successful in his quest, we must wonder--if our own actions can constitute libel, if someone else puts it on display, then how will there ever be any transparency or consequences for unethical behaviors?
What kind of politics is this?
See Also: Press release: Global media monitoring project

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] I will not SHUT UP , GIVE UP and I WONT go away!!.

Permalink

22.11.09

Dossier: Warren Farrell: MISS MOTHERS INTELLIGENCE SECRET SERVICE

Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] I will not SHUT UP , GIVE UP and I WONT go away!!.

Permalink

http://mothersintelligencesecretservice.wordpress.com/2009/11/22/dossier-warren-farrell/

 

Dossier: Warren Farrell

Posted on November 22, 2009 by mothersintelligencesecretservice

Warren Farrell is an icon for  radical mens cells as Osama bin laden is for the violent Jihad movement.  References from his books can bee seen on nearly every radical mens cell in the world.    In his book The Myth of Male Power, he distorts the perception of women as though they are an object to exploit and despise of if they do not submit to every demand.   His literature has become the precipice of rage towards government and the erosion of basic human rights of women and children at their mercy.    One of the most alarming aspects of this leader, is his promotion of incest and rape:

In penthouse magazine interview, he referred to incest as though it were a positive experience for all family members concerned:

In an article called Jihad and rape go hand in hand, the words are different, but the intent is the same:

One of the quotes of Warren Farrell, compares womens rights as though they are the war instigators:

The Al Qaeda had a similar message when France made a law against burkas to stop the subjecting of women:

In both statements, it was made out to be that those who try to promote the rights of women are the ones who are terrorists.

1 Votes


Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

Filed under: Mothers Rights | Tagged: Al Queda, Berkas, Child Sexual Abuse, Childrens RIghts Council, Dangerous, Date Rape, Divorce, Domestic Extremists, Family, Fatherhood, Fathers Rights Movement, Feminism, France, Incest: The Last Taboo, Jihad, Mens Cell, Osama bin Laden,Parent Alienation Canada, Penthouse, Radical Islam, Rape, Terrorism, Terrorists, The Myth Of Male Power, Violence Against Women, Warren Farrell

« Dossier: Mike J Murphy

Technorati Tags: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Note: Cross posted from [wp angelfury] I will not SHUT UP , GIVE UP and I WONT go away!!.

Permalink